Fir this i just want the outline.
Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans on Aug 29, 2005. In a 15–20-page paper, you are expected to address the following:
Evaluate the mitigation plans or programs available, in process or in place in the years leading up to the storm and how effective they were to deal with the impacts of Katrina. Specifically,
o what was well planned for. (Local, State and Federal funding programs — eg., engineering enhancements , infrastructure protection, interoperable communications)
o what was not well planned for.
o what should have been anticipated by the emergency managers at that time.
Evaluate the preparedness plans New Orleans had in place in the years leading up to the storm and how effective they were to deal with a storm like Hurricane Katrina. Specifically,
o what was well planned for.
o what was not well planned for.
o what should have been anticipated by the emergency managers at that time.
Evaluate the response efforts of the Local, State and Federal governments. Specifically,
o how well coordinated were they as individual entities—e.g., did the local government acting amongst themselves have a plan in place that was ready to be implemented, effective, and well executed? The same for the state and federal governments.
o how well coordinated were the Local, State and Federal governments in acting as one team (system) —e.g., what issues did they experience and why, what could have been done to prevent any issues, and what worked well and the reason behind it?
o What obstacles occurred causing chaos and confusion? Could these have been avoided or minimized and if so, how? Where the issues addressed at all in the preparation phase—if so, why were they not implemented effectively during the response phase?
Evaluate the recovery phase of Hurricane Katrina.Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans on Aug 29, 2005. In a 15–20-page paper, you are expected to address the following:
Evaluate the mitigation plans or programs available, in process or in place in the years leading up to the storm and how effective they were to deal with the impacts of Katrina. Specifically,
o what was well planned for. (Local, State and Federal funding programs — eg., engineering enhancements , infrastructure protection, interoperable communications)
o what was not well planned for.
o what should have been anticipated by the emergency managers at that time.
Evaluate the preparedness plans New Orleans had in place in the years leading up to the storm and how effective they were to deal with a storm like Hurricane Katrina. Specifically,
o what was well planned for.
o what was not well planned for.
o what should have been anticipated by the emergency managers at that time.
Evaluate the response efforts of the Local, State and Federal governments. Specifically,
o how well coordinated were they as individual entities—e.g., did the local government acting amongst themselves have a plan in place that was ready to be implemented, effective, and well executed? The same for the state and federal governments.
o how well coordinated were the Local, State and Federal governments in acting as one team (system) —e.g., what issues did they experience and why, what could have been done to prevent any issues, and what worked well and the reason behind it?
o What obstacles occurred causing chaos and confusion? Could these have been avoided or minimized and if so, how? Where the issues addressed at all in the preparation phase—if so, why were they not implemented effectively during the response phase?
Evaluate the recovery phase of Hurricane Katrina.Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans on Aug 29, 2005. In a 15–20-page paper, you are expected to address the following:
Evaluate the mitigation plans or programs available, in process or in place in the years leading up to the storm and how effective they were to deal with the impacts of Katrina. Specifically,
o what was well planned for. (Local, State and Federal funding programs — eg., engineering enhancements , infrastructure protection, interoperable communications)
o what was not well planned for.
o what should have been anticipated by the emergency managers at that time.
Evaluate the preparedness plans New Orleans had in place in the years leading up to the storm and how effective they were to deal with a storm like Hurricane Katrina. Specifically,
o what was well planned for.
o what was not well planned for.
o what should have been anticipated by the emergency managers at that time.
Evaluate the response efforts of the Local, State and Federal governments. Specifically,
o how well coordinated were they as individual entities—e.g., did the local government acting amongst themselves have a plan in place that was ready to be implemented, effective, and well executed? The same for the state and federal governments.
o how well coordinated were the Local, State and Federal governments in acting as one team (system) —e.g., what issues did they experience and why, what could have been done to prevent any issues, and what worked well and the reason behind it?
o What obstacles occurred causing chaos and confusion? Could these have been avoided or minimized and if so, how? Where the issues addressed at all in the preparation phase—if so, why were they not implemented effectively during the response phase?
Evaluate the recovery phase of Hurricane Katrina.
o explain the importance of the Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP) of individual agencies to ensure they can continue to perform their essential functions as the community rebuilds—e.g., which organizations were successful, and which were not and why. o explain the After Action Report published on Feb 1, 2006.
Evaluate the preparation plans, response efforts, and recovery aspect that lead to the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act. Specifically,
o summarize the Act.
o summarize why Congress felt there was a need for the Act.
o summarize the changes this Act brought about in emergency management AND why these changes are important AND how these changes benefit communities impacted by disasters.
Formatting
This is a 15–20-page paper (not including title page and resources). Please use APA format.
o 12-point font (Times New Roman)
o 1-inch margins
o Double space
o Title page formatted in accordance with APA style
o Page headers
o Page numbers
o Abstract
o Proper citationso explain the importance of the Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP) of individual agencies to ensure they can continue to perform their essential functions as the community rebuilds—e.g., which organizations were successful, and which were not and why. o explain the After Action Report published on Feb 1, 2006.
Evaluate the preparation plans, response efforts, and recovery aspect that lead to the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act. Specifically,
o summarize the Act.
o summarize why Congress felt there was a need for the Act.
o summarize the changes this Act brought about in emergency management AND why these changes are important AND how these changes benefit communities impacted by disasters.
Formatting
This is a 15–20-page paper (not including title page and resources). Please use APA format.
o 12-point font (Times New Roman)
o 1-inch margins
o Double space
o Title page formatted in accordance with APA style
o Page headers
o Page numbers
o Abstract
o Proper citationso explain the importance of the Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP) of individual agencies to ensure they can continue to perform their essential functions as the community rebuilds—e.g., which organizations were successful, and which were not and why. o explain the After Action Report published on Feb 1, 2006.
Evaluate the preparation plans, response efforts, and recovery aspect that lead to the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act. Specifically,
o summarize the Act.
o summarize why Congress felt there was a need for the Act.
o summarize the changes this Act brought about in emergency management AND why these changes are important AND how these changes benefit communities impacted by disasters.
Formatting
This is a 15–20-page paper (not including title page and resources). Please use APA format.
o 12-point font (Times New Roman)
o 1-inch margins
o Double space
o Title page formatted in accordance with APA style
o Page headers
o Page numbers
o Abstract
o Proper citationso explain the importance of the Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP) of individual agencies to ensure they can continue to perform their essential functions as the community rebuilds—e.g., which organizations were successful, and which were not and why. o explain the After Action Report published on Feb 1, 2006.
Evaluate the preparation plans, response efforts, and recovery aspect that lead to the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act. Specifically,
o summarize the Act.
o summarize why Congress felt there was a need for the Act.
o summarize the changes this Act brought about in emergency management AND why these changes are important AND how these changes benefit communities impacted by disasters.
Formatting
This is a 15–20-page paper (not including title page and resources). Please use APA format.
o 12-point font (Times New Roman)
o 1-inch margins
o Double space
o Title page formatted in accordance with APA style
o Page headers
o Page numbers
o Abstract
o Proper citationso explain the importance of the Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP) of individual agencies to ensure they can continue to perform their essential functions as the community rebuilds—e.g., which organizations were successful, and which were not and why. o explain the After Action Report published on Feb 1, 2006.
Evaluate the preparation plans, response efforts, and recovery aspect that lead to the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act. Specifically,
o summarize the Act.
o summarize why Congress felt there was a need for the Act.
o summarize the changes this Act brought about in emergency management AND why these changes are important AND how these changes benefit communities impacted by disasters.
Formatting
This is a 15–20-page paper (not including title page and resources). Please use APA format.
o 12-point font (Times New Roman)
o 1-inch margins
o Double space
o Title page formatted in accordance with APA style
o Page headers
o Page numbers
o Abstract
o Proper citations