You are in your second year of an elected two-year term on the system-wide Quality Improvement Interprofessional Council. The chair of the council has asked you as an APN to review this case, utilize a performance improvement model, and apply the findings/recommendations for system and practice changes to your current employer.
Review the following video and documents on the case study. *
RaDonda Vaught speaks out l GMA [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQELinks to an external site.. (4:56).
Harrington, L. (2022). The RaDonda Vaught case: A critical conversation on nursing practice and technology. AACN Advanced Critical Care, November 8, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2023873. Links to an external site.
State of Tennessee vs. RaDonda Vaught: Discovery request response. Available at https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdf Note pages 5-6, 50-51.
Apply one of the Quality Improvement Models discussed in the course, or choose an approach from the literature, or the one used in your workplace to analyze the case.
Summarize the case in one paragraph, highlighting the role of HIT.
Describe briefly the model chosen for the analysis.
Provide a rationale for using the selected model over other options.
Follow the model steps and processes to identify the quality, safety, security, privacy, and unintended consequences issues in the case.
List interprofessional team members who may be consulted on this process and their expected role.
Design strategies for your workplace to mitigate the issues identified from the case.
Provide at least one visual of the process and proposed changes (i.e., flow chart, process map, data quality, pareto chart, control chart, data visualization).
Identify changes if needed to policies, EHR, equipment, and other HIT applications.
Create a communication/transition plan.
Develop a staff education plan on changes.
What change theory would be best for this program?
What educational deliver method (s) would be most effective?
Compose metrics for evaluating the plan in each of the learning domains:
Cognitive
Psychomotor
Effective
Reflect on the ramifications of criminalizing the nonintentional reporting of mistakes on your own advanced practice, the nursing profession, and Quality Improvement practices.
Submit the written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length, not including title page, the 1-page reflection and references. Use headers to distinguish the sections of the paper.
*Note: There are gaps in information available to the public on this case. For the purposes of this project, you may devise realistic responses and fill in the gaps, missing, or incomplete information as appropriate. You are in your second year of an elected two-year term on the system-wide Quality Improvement Interprofessional Council. The chair of the council has asked you as an APN to review this case, utilize a performance improvement model, and apply the findings/recommendations for system and practice changes to your current employer.
Review the following video and documents on the case study. *
RaDonda Vaught speaks out l GMA [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQELinks to an external site.. (4:56).
Harrington, L. (2022). The RaDonda Vaught case: A critical conversation on nursing practice and technology. AACN Advanced Critical Care, November 8, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2023873. Links to an external site.
State of Tennessee vs. RaDonda Vaught: Discovery request response. Available at https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdf Note pages 5-6, 50-51.
Apply one of the Quality Improvement Models discussed in the course, or choose an approach from the literature, or the one used in your workplace to analyze the case.
Summarize the case in one paragraph, highlighting the role of HIT.
Describe briefly the model chosen for the analysis.
Provide a rationale for using the selected model over other options.
Follow the model steps and processes to identify the quality, safety, security, privacy, and unintended consequences issues in the case.
List interprofessional team members who may be consulted on this process and their expected role.
Design strategies for your workplace to mitigate the issues identified from the case.
Provide at least one visual of the process and proposed changes (i.e., flow chart, process map, data quality, pareto chart, control chart, data visualization).
Identify changes if needed to policies, EHR, equipment, and other HIT applications.
Create a communication/transition plan.
Develop a staff education plan on changes.
What change theory would be best for this program?
What educational deliver method (s) would be most effective?
Compose metrics for evaluating the plan in each of the learning domains:
Cognitive
Psychomotor
Effective
Reflect on the ramifications of criminalizing the nonintentional reporting of mistakes on your own advanced practice, the nursing profession, and Quality Improvement practices.
Submit the written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length, not including title page, the 1-page reflection and references. Use headers to distinguish the sections of the paper.
*Note: There are gaps in information available to the public on this case. For the purposes of this project, you may devise realistic responses and fill in the gaps, missing, or incomplete information as appropriate. You are in your second year of an elected two-year term on the system-wide Quality Improvement Interprofessional Council. The chair of the council has asked you as an APN to review this case, utilize a performance improvement model, and apply the findings/recommendations for system and practice changes to your current employer.
Review the following video and documents on the case study. *
RaDonda Vaught speaks out l GMA [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryphwWHAgQE (4:56).
Harrington, L. (2022). The RaDonda Vaught case: A critical conversation on nursing practice and technology. AACN Advanced Critical Care, November 8, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2023873.
State of Tennessee vs. RaDonda Vaught: Discovery request response. Available at https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6785652/RaDonda-Vaught-DA-Discovery.pdf Note pages 5-6, 50-51.
Apply one of the Quality Improvement Models discussed in the course, or choose an approach from the literature, or the one used in your workplace to analyze the case.
Summarize the case in one paragraph, highlighting the role of HIT.
Describe briefly the model chosen for the analysis.
Provide a rationale for using the selected model over other options.
Follow the model steps and processes to identify the quality, safety, security, privacy, and unintended consequences issues in the case.
List interprofessional team members who may be consulted on this process and their expected role.
Design strategies for your workplace to mitigate the issues identified from the case.
Provide at least one visual of the process and proposed changes (i.e., flow chart, process map, data quality, pareto chart, control chart, data visualization).
Identify changes if needed to policies, EHR, equipment, and other HIT applications.
Create a communication/transition plan.
Develop a staff education plan on changes.
What change theory would be best for this program?
What educational deliver method (s) would be most effective?
Compose metrics for evaluating the plan in each of the learning domains:
Cognitive
Psychomotor
Effective
Reflect on the ramifications of criminalizing the nonintentional reporting of mistakes on your own advanced practice, the nursing profession, and Quality Improvement practices.
Submit the written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length, not including title page, the 1-page reflection and references. Use headers to distinguish the sections of the paper.
*Note: There are gaps in information available to the public on this case. For the purposes of this project, you may devise realistic responses and fill in the gaps, missing, or incomplete information as appropriate.