Because criminology is closely connected to sociology, explanations of criminal behavior
have been predominantly sociological. Some criminological theorists who offer biological and psychological explanations for criminal behavior believe that their theories, for various
reasons, have not been as broadly accepted or considered. Some newer criminologists, like Brian Boutwell, even argue that criminology will cease to be relevant because other fields
more welcoming to biological theories, specifically genetic influences, will surpass
criminology and offer better ways to reduce crime. They argue that genetic influences should be a key consideration in criminology as we advance.
Take a position. Should genetic influences be a key consideration in the advancement of
criminology?
First, title your post either “Genetic influences should be a key consideration in the
advancement of criminology” or “Genetic influences should not be a key consideration in the advancement of criminology.”
Then, make your case. Provide your rationale supported by research to defend your position.
You may want to take into consideration some of the following as you make your case:
Why might biological and psychological theories be dismissed or not considered relevant by
criminologists and criminal justice professionals?
What are some of the concerns about genetics research?
How does including genetic influences make other criminological theories stronger?
How might considering genetic influences in applying theory help criminal justice professionals reduce or prevent crime?