A case study on, “Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster” (February 1, 2003) Using Existentialist Ethics

This assignment is a case analysis on the “Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster” using Existentialist 

ethics. Here is the prompt, also citations are required preferrably philisophy articles and can cite the case and specific occurances. Here is the prompt:
 1. Identify the moral issue under consideration.
2. Note available options.
3. Ask this question for each available option: Would I want all of humanity to accept my
example as an endorsement and standard of morally correct behavior?
4. Any answer of “no” to an option, would negate that option as a morally permissible choice.
5. An answer of “yes” to an option is inconclusive, as it may simply mean that the subject
doesn’t care about the consequences of his or her actions. Identify the moral issue under consideration.
2. Note available options.
3. Ask this question for each available option: Would I want all of humanity to accept my
example as an endorsement and standard of morally correct behavior?
4. Any answer of “no” to an option, would negate that option as a morally permissible choice.
5. An answer of “yes” to an option is inconclusive, as it may simply mean that the subject
doesn’t care about the consequences of his or her actions.
The Moral Issue is: 
Central Moral Issue: When is complacency to persistent issues a negligence of duty? Did NASA have a moral obligation to tell the Columbia astronauts immediately upon launch that there was an issue instead of letting them complete a 16-day mission? The Columbia was NASA’s most successful space shuttle, with 27 successful missions. But on the 28th mission, the persistent issue with the central fuel tank shedding foam upon launch, which had been deemed an acceptable risk, caused the destruction of the shuttle and killed all astronauts onboard. NASA knew there was a problem after launch but did not tell the crew, allowing them to continue their 16-day mission. It was only as the crew headed for reentry that they were told of the danger.Central Moral Issue: When is complacency to persistent issues a negligence of duty? Did NASA have a moral obligation to tell the Columbia astronauts immediately upon launch that there was an issue instead of letting them complete a 16-day mission? The Columbia was NASA’s most successful space shuttle, with 27 successful missions. But on the 28th mission, the persistent issue with the central fuel tank shedding foam upon launch, which had been deemed an acceptable risk, caused the destruction of the shuttle and killed all astronauts onboard. NASA knew there was a problem after launch but did not tell the crew, allowing them to continue their 16-day mission. It was only as the crew headed for reentry that they were told of the danger.

Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!

Whatever paper you need - we will help you write it

Get started

Starts at $9 /page

How our paper writing service works

It's very simple!

  • Fill out the order form

    Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.

  • Choose writer

    Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.

  • Add funds

    Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.

  • Ready

    Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.