Case Scenario: Implementing Performance Measurement Systems

February 18, 2023February 18, 2023 Discipline: Business
Learning Goal: I’m working on a business writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

There are several types of measures and methods for assessing performance: job results/outcomes, essay methods, ranking, forced distribution, behavioral checklists, behavioral anchored rating scales (BARS), and management by objectives (MBO). Prior to beginning this assignment, read Chapters 4 and 5 of the course text to learn about key considerations in choosing one type of measurement procedure over another. For this assignment, you will be assessing comparative and absolute performance measurement systems to be considered for implementation.

PART I: Comparative Performance Measurement System

As the human resources manager of an HR team of 30 for a mid-sized construction company, you decide to implement a comparative performance measurement system to measure performance in your department

  • Assess the advantages and disadvantages of implementing a comparative performance measurement system.
  • Explain three to five kinds of comparative performance measurement systems that are available for you to consider.
  • Choose one approach, and explain how you would implement it in your department.
    • Explain why your selection was the best choice among the variety of comparative performance measurement systems.

PART II: Absolute Performance Measurement System

At the end of the year, a company-wide initiative calls for a revision of the performance measurement systems. Every manager including you, will be required to develop an absolute performance measurement system. The process is complicated by the fact that many of your direct reports are remote employees who interact via email and phone rather than in person.

  • Assess the advantages and disadvantages of implementing an absolute performance measurement system.
  • Explain three to five kinds of absolute performance measurement systems.
  • Choose one approach, and explain how you would implement an absolute performance measurement system in your department next year, recognizing that you have limited time to devote to your department as you will be supporting other departments for the implementation in their areas.
    • Explain what you will consider in choosing an absolute performance measurement system.

PART III: Conclusion

Now you must decide which performance measurement system will work best for your department.

  • Compare and contrast the two performance measurement systems.
  • Choose one performance measurement system that you feel will best work for your department.
    • Provide a rationale for your decision.
  • Support your statements with scholarly and/or credible sources.

The Case Scenario: Implementing Performance Measurement Systems paper

  • Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center
    Links to an external site.    .
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least two scholarly and/or credible sources, in addition to the course text.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate reference description:
  • Total Possible Score: 8.00

    Part 1: Assesses the Implementation of a Comparative Performance Measurement System, Explains Three to Five Kinds of Comparative Systems, and Chooses One Approach, Explaining How it Would be Implemented

    Distinguished – Comprehensively assesses the implementation of a comparative performance management system, thoroughly explains five kinds of comparative systems, and accurately chooses one approach, fully explaining how it would be implemented.Proficient – Assesses the implementation of a comparative performance management system, explains three to five kinds of comparative systems, and chooses one approach, explaining how it would be implemented. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.Basic – Minimally assesses the implementation of a comparative performance management system, partially explains three kinds of comparative systems, and chooses one approach, somewhat explaining how it would be implemented. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.Below Expectations – Attempts to assess the implementation of a comparative performance management system; however, does not explain comparative systems, and the explanation of how it would be implemented is significantly underdeveloped and/or contains inaccuracies.Non-Performance – The assessment of the implementation of a comparative performance management system is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

    Part 2: Assesses the Implementation of an Absolute Performance Management System, Explains Three to Five Kinds of Absolute Systems, and Chooses One Approach, Explaining How it Would be Implemented

    Distinguished – Comprehensively and accurately assesses the implementation of an absolute performance management system, thoroughly explains five kinds of absolute systems, and clearly chooses one approach, fully explaining how it would be implemented.Proficient – Assesses the implementation of an absolute performance management system, explains three to five kinds of absolute systems, and chooses one approach, explaining how it would be implemented. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped or contains inaccuracies.Basic – Partially assesses the implementation of an absolute performance management system, explains three or fewer kinds of absolute systems, chooses one approach, somewhat explaining how it would be implemented. The explanation is underdeveloped and/or contains inaccuracies.Below Expectations – Attempts to assess the implementation of an absolute performance management system; however, does not explain any absolute systems, or the explanation of how it would be implemented is significantly underdeveloped and contains inaccuracies.Non-Performance – The assessment of the implementation of an absolute performance management system is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

    Part 3: Compares and Contrasts the Two Performance Measurement Systems

    Distinguished – Comprehensively compares and contrasts the two performance measurement systems.Proficient – Compares and contrasts the two performance measurement systems. The comparison is slightly underdeveloped.Basic – Partially compares and contrasts the two performance measurement systems. The comparison is underdeveloped.Below Expectations – Attempts to compare and contrast the two performance measurement systems; however, the comparison is significantly underdeveloped.Non-Performance – The comparison of the two performance measurement systems is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

    Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

    Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

    Written Communication: APA Formatting

    Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

    Written Communication: Page Requirement

    Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages. Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

    Written Communication: Resource Requirement

    Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
    Powered by s page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.

Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!

Whatever paper you need - we will help you write it

Get started

Starts at $9 /page

Login Register Reset

How our paper writing service works

It's very simple!

  • Fill out the order form

    Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.

  • Choose writer

    Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.

  • Add funds

    Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.

  • Ready

    Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.

Place order now