Dissertation on Leadership. Topic: Boundary of Leaders Authority and Powers: To What Extent?

Topic: Boundary of Leaders Authority and Powers: To What Extent?

Research questions:
1. What are the key factors that determine the boundaries of a leader’s authority and powers within an organisation?
2. What are the ethical considerations and moral responsibilities associated with the exercise of a leader’s authority and powers?
3. What are the implications of the boundaries of a leader’s authority and powers for organisational efficiency, effectiveness, and stability?

Justification:
By conducting research on the boundary of leaders’ authority and powers, the researcher can gain valuable insights into the nature of leadership, its impact on organisations and societies, and how it can be effectively managed to promote responsible and accountable leadership. First, exploring the boundaries of a leader’s authority and powers is crucial for understanding the dynamics of leadership within organisations or governments. It helps shed light on how leaders exercise their authority, make decisions, and interact with stakeholders. Second, since leaders wield significant power, it is important to examine the ethical implications of their authority and powers. By exploring the boundaries, the researcher can identify ethical dilemmas, conflicts of interest, and potential abuses of power that may arise in leadership roles. Finally, the research on the boundaries of a leader’s authority and powers can have practical implications for developing effective leadership practices. It can inform leaders about the limitations and constraints they must consider, as well as the importance of collaboration and consultation with stakeholders.

Methodology:
Non-empirical research focusing on several case studies in the field of leaders authority and power. The usage of this methodology presents several challenges. To begin with, non-empirical research heavily relies on specific case studies, which may limit the generalizability of findings. Each case study represents a unique context, and it can be challenging to extrapolate the findings to other settings or situations. In addition, the selection of case studies may introduce bias. There is a tendency that the researcher may choose cases that align with their preconceived notions or desired outcomes, potentially overlooking other relevant cases that could provide contrasting or contradictory evidence. Moreover, non-empirical research often involves qualitative analysis, which is subjective and prone to interpretation. Researchers’ biases, perspectives, and interpretations may influence the analysis and conclusions drawn from the case studies. Furthermore, in non-empirical research, researchers do not have control over the variables studied, as they rely on existing data and observations. This lack of control makes it difficult to establish causal relationships between variables and limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions.

To mitigate these challenges, the researcher plans to carefully consider her research design, ensure transparency in their methods, acknowledge potential biases, seek diverse perspectives, and triangulate findings with other sources of evidence whenever possible. Additionally, the researcher will clearly articulate the limitations of their research and provide a balanced interpretation of the findings, taking into account the contextual factors of each case study.

This dissertation examines the boundary of leaders’ authority and powers within organizations by aiming to understand the factors as well as limitations and constraints that define their authority. The research investigates the key factors shaping these boundaries, such as legal frameworks, cultural contexts, and accountability mechanisms. The study employs a non-empirical approach, focusing on multiple case studies to provide in-depth analysis and insights. While non-empirical research presents challenges in terms of generalizability and subjectivity, the thesis aims to address these limitations by employing rigorous qualitative analysis and considering diverse perspectives. The findings contribute to the understanding of leadership dynamics, ethical considerations, and practical implications for effective leadership. Ultimately, the dissertation aims to shed light on the extent of leaders’ authority and powers and their implications for organizational or governmental functioning, accountability, and the well-being of stakeholders.

The case studies used in the dissertation will comprised of Leadership in Corporate Governance and Leadership in International Organizations. The data will be drawn from case studies primarily in EU and Europe.

Case studies will be compiled from academic journals in the field of leadership and management, including Journal of Management, Journal of Business Ethics, Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Leadership & Management, Strategic Management Journal, and etc.

The data will be publicly accessed after registration or subscription on platforms.