Write a two-page critical response to “Developing the Prison-To-School Pipeline Download Developing the Prison-To-School Pipeline.” Use your notes as a reference point to further analyze the terms, ideas, and evidence conveyed. Think of this exercise as a criticism of expert work—even though the article may seem polished and perfect, every research entry needs to be further analyzed and interpreted, especially for the purposes of argument. Does the author consider everything there is to consider? They would likely agree that they have not or at least would want to continue a discussion. Trust that you have something to add to that discussion.
Do not summarize, quote, or cite the text; rather, respond with your interpretations, analysis, and insights. You may, in your own words, mention ideas that the author has stated to help as a reference point to your analysis.
Make sure to state the name of the article and author in your response, as if a total stranger not in our class could understand what you are referencing. Do not use first person, especially “I think,” “I feel,” and “I believe.”
ChatGPT or similar AI/grammar-fixing applications are not allowed on this assignment or any in this course. Usage will result in a zero grade on the first instance, then reported on the next instance. If you are worried about your writing quality, I assure you that you will learn progressively and receive a better grade if you do honest work.