it’s about Kurt Vonnegut’s works: “Slaughterhouse-Five,” “Cat’s Cradle,” and any one of his short stories. I need examples from the writings that show Vonnegut’s beliefs that war is immoral and that he does this by portraying the brutal realities of war through the perspectives of those who have witnessed its violence, in addition to vividly illustrating the impact of war on the soldiers.
it has to include three other journals as sources but I have them already and they just need to be integrated in the paper
Hume, Kathryn. “Kurt Vonnegut and the Myths and Symbols of Meaning.� Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 24, no. 4, 1982, pp. 429–47. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40754697. Accessed 16 Feb. 2023.
“In the initiation ordeals he describes, innocence is not laid aside, to be replaced in the natural course of things by knowledge and maturity; innocence is murdered, and only a void remains.� (437)
that’s one
Kunze, Peter C. “For the Boys: Masculinity, Gray Comedy, and the Vietnam War in ‘Slaughterhouse-Five.’� Studies in American Humor, no. 26, 2012, pp. 41–57. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23823831. Accessed 16 Feb. 2023.
“War does not make boys into men; it devastates, corrupts, destroys, and (obviously) kills. These texts superimpose the innocent/experience binary onto boyhood/manhood to show that this experience does not masculinize, but rather mentally and emotionally stunts these young soldiers.� (43)
here’s another
and then heres the last one: Lundberg, David. “The American Literature of War: The Civil War, World War I, and World War II.� American Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, 1984, pp. 373–88. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2712739. Accessed 17 Feb. 2023.
“Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five (1969), two of the most popular novels of the 1960s, treated the war satirically, as something crazy and absurd. Both works used World War II as a means of commenting indirectly on the military mentality of the Cold War period.â€� (387)
if any of these doesn’t fit into the paper, that’s alright there can be a different source as long as it’s from JSTOR, is 15-25 pages, and is peer reviewedHume, Kathryn. “Kurt Vonnegut and the Myths and Symbols of Meaning.â€� Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 24, no. 4, 1982, pp. 429–47. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40754697. Accessed 16 Feb. 2023.
“In the initiation ordeals he describes, innocence is not laid aside, to be replaced in the natural course of things by knowledge and maturity; innocence is murdered, and only a void remains.� (437)
that’s one
Kunze, Peter C. “For the Boys: Masculinity, Gray Comedy, and the Vietnam War in ‘Slaughterhouse-Five.’� Studies in American Humor, no. 26, 2012, pp. 41–57. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23823831. Accessed 16 Feb. 2023.
“War does not make boys into men; it devastates, corrupts, destroys, and (obviously) kills. These texts superimpose the innocent/experience binary onto boyhood/manhood to show that this experience does not masculinize, but rather mentally and emotionally stunts these young soldiers.� (43)
here’s another
and then heres the last one: Lundberg, David. “The American Literature of War: The Civil War, World War I, and World War II.� American Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, 1984, pp. 373–88. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2712739. Accessed 17 Feb. 2023.
“Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five (1969), two of the most popular novels of the 1960s, treated the war satirically, as something crazy and absurd. Both works used World War II as a means of commenting indirectly on the military mentality of the Cold War period.â€� (387)
if any of these doesn’t fit into the paper, that’s alright there can be a different source as long as it’s from JSTOR, is 15-25 pages, and is peer reviewed