This is the whole prompt (and grading rubric below): What is William Clifford’s primary argument to show that we are not entitled to hold beliefs under certain conditions? What if I live alone in the wilderness and I form a belief via one of the fallacious arguments that we studied in Module 2? Would Clifford still […]
Discipline: Philosophy
Case Analysis: Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, Goodyear, Perdue FarmsCase Analysis: Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, Goodyear, Perdue Farms
Please review the assignment instructions first if you have any other questions please let me know! Below is the reference for the Sections 9.1 and 9.2 pdf file: Hardy, J, Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). Chapter 9: Logic in real life Download Chapter 9: Logic in real life. In With good reason: A guide to […]
Monogamy: Chalmers and York offer a debate about the permissibility of monogamy. The debate rests on multiple pillars, including practicality, specialness, and jealousy.Monogamy: Chalmers and York offer a debate about the permissibility of monogamy. The debate rests on multiple pillars, including practicality, specialness, and jealousy.
v Format: Times New Roman, 12 point, 1” margins, Microsoft Word or PDF format (no Pages documents). Monogamy: Chalmers and York offer a debate about the permissibility of monogamy. The debate rests on multiple pillars, including practicality, specialness, and jealousy. In your paper, offer a rehearsal of each side of the debate as it pertains […]
paper summarizing the core features of one of the positions/theories of one of the philosopherspaper summarizing the core features of one of the positions/theories of one of the philosophers
Write a paper summarizing the core features of one of the positions/theories of one of the philosophers on the syllabus and provide one possible objection to the theory (you may either defend the philosopher from an objection or agree with the objection). Approximately 850 words should be devoted to exegesis and 300 words to the objection, for a total of approximately 1200- […]
The Problems of Philosophy” by Bertrand Russell in the Philosophy Field Guide Companion Reader, Vol. 1 (pp 411 – 424The Problems of Philosophy” by Bertrand Russell in the Philosophy Field Guide Companion Reader, Vol. 1 (pp 411 – 424
For your primary source response, please read the selection from “The Problems of Philosophy” by Bertrand Russell in the Philosophy Field Guide Companion Reader, Vol. 1 (pp 411 – 424). Then respond to it by telling me what you took from it. source use the file i provided must provide PLAGIARISM REPORT
Writing more about thinking debates ethics and include the examples from the link.Writing more about thinking debates ethics and include the examples from the link.
You are to write an essay explaining which lesson, from the second half of the course, you found most thought provoking and why. Your essay must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words), double-spaced, in 12-point font. The purpose of this assignment is for you to demonstrate your understanding of one of the central debates on […]
Write 3 paragraphs explaining the following: 1. Define ONE SPECIFIC informal fallacy or cognitive bias. (i.e., “ad hominem,” “False dichotomy,” “Confirmation bias” etc.) Make sure to use a formal definition and cite the source.Write 3 paragraphs explaining the following: 1. Define ONE SPECIFIC informal fallacy or cognitive bias. (i.e., “ad hominem,” “False dichotomy,” “Confirmation bias” etc.) Make sure to use a formal definition and cite the source.
https://openstax.org/books/introduction-philosophy/pages/2-2-overcoming-cognitive-biases-and-engaging-in-critical-reflection https://openstax.org/books/introduction-philosophy/pages/5-5-informal-fallacies https://www.fallacyfiles.org/ These are the materials that can be used for. Write 3 paragraphs explaining the following: 1. Define ONE SPECIFIC informal fallacy or cognitive bias. (i.e., “ad hominem,” “False dichotomy,” “Confirmation bias” etc.) Make sure to use a formal definition and cite the source. Cite as (author, page number). This definition and the citation […]
Exam online from 9 am – 12 am , answering 20 short questions on philosophy course materialExam online from 9 am – 12 am , answering 20 short questions on philosophy course material
When you enter the exam, you will see twenty (20) question links. The exam is three hours long. That gives you roughly nine (9) minutes per question. Those who are wise will keep an eye on the clock. “Nine minutes” does not mean that you should write for nine minutes. Each of your answers should […]
Reflective paper about The Grand inquisitor book and the formal arguments (Ontological, Cosmological, Teleological) for the existence of god and for why one should have faith (Pascal’s Wager and the subsequent argument against arguments).Reflective paper about The Grand inquisitor book and the formal arguments (Ontological, Cosmological, Teleological) for the existence of god and for why one should have faith (Pascal’s Wager and the subsequent argument against arguments).
Resources relevant to this assignment are found in Module Two Content: Units Six, Seven, and Eight. Be sure to make use of all of these resources. Please write a 3-4-page (interestingly titled, 12-point professional-looking font, double-spaced, defensibly-documented, and one-inch margins) paper in which you discuss in some detail the tension between the views of faith presented in The […]
three theories that are fundamental in any ethical analysis: utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics.three theories that are fundamental in any ethical analysis: utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics.
Write:Start your initial post by identifying two characteristics of utilitarianism, two characteristics of virtue ethics, and two characteristics of deontology. Organize this part of your post so that it is clear which characteristics belong to which ethical theory. You can do this by means of subtitles, or by presenting a table. You should aim to […]