Balancing Strategic Interests & Sovereignty: U.S. – Greenland Relations in Light of Arctic Tensions

I have written the first part of the assignment. The total pages need to be 30, please add 20 more pages. See the file for the topic and some relevant sources. Please use APA for referencing.Greenland is gradually becoming more sovereign. This means that economic support from Denmark is falling, but Greenland does not have a diverse or stable economy of its own yet – but it has potential for key resources under the melting ice. Russia, China and the U.S. is interested in the arctic for this reason and Greenland’s position geographically and in terms of resources to be unveiled make it a key interest for the U.S. as a means to counter and maneuver around Russian/Chinese advancements (balance of power theory + realism).Provide a case study on Trumps 2 incidents of wanting to buy Greenland (2019 + December 2024).Please touch upon the many sabotage cases of data caples in and around arctic and Russian/Chinese trade routes, where Russian/Chinese affiliated ships have been found and suspected of severing data cables between countries and in Svalbad. Most recently around Sweden. Put the frequency of similar cases and where they occurred, by what country’s affiliated ship in a table. Denmark also negotiated with China on severed cables in Kattegat (danish jurisdiction)Also include graphics on current active Russian bases/sattelite stations with years of opening. Compare it with the list of current active american bases/stations and compare it with the number of closed former cold war american bases stations.And lastly compare it with the Atlantic kapacity package here https://www.fmn.dk/da/nyheder/2021/politisk-aftale-om-arktis-kapacitetspakke-til-15-mia.-kroner/ for Greenland, agreed upon between Denmark, U.S. and Greenland.Touch upon USA’s dissatisfaction with Denmark and the NATO member nations, for not spending the agreed upon 2% GDP on military advancement and for not being effective in realizing the arctic capacity plan. U.S. was successfell in making these nations agree on the terms, but financially the nations are not where U.S. wanted them to be.Include pre-made relevant graphics/tables. There are some present on the added references.