Choose from one of the following situations and write a 900-1200 word argumentative essay explaining what the proper moral choice should be. One portion of the paper (300-400 words) must provide a Biblical discussion with some reference to the decalogue and perfect/imperfect duties, while another (200-300 words) must be non-Biblical, using words that would be convincing to a non-Christian. Also, compare or contrast your view (200-300 words) with how utilitarian reasoning might address the situation.
1. An individual who has a terminal illness wishes to take his own life. He is 70 years old and considers himself a financial burden on his family. He wants to explore the possibility of physician-assisted suicide.
2. A woman has learned she is pregnant with a child suspected of having Down syndrome and is considering an abortion. She already has three small children, and she feels the strain of having a child with special needs would be more than she could bear.
A successful paper will contain the following elements:
- Is between 900 and 1200 words long.
- Has a clear, focused thesis or unifying message.
- Is a well organized, argumentative essay that transitions smoothly from point to point.
- Shows that you are aware of opposing points of view.
- Demonstrates you have an excellent understanding of the terms Decalogue, perfect and imperfect duties, and Moral Law while using these key concepts in the same way as the authors in the assigned course readings.
- Makes impressive insights while comparing and contrasting your own position with utilitarianism.
- Presents a strong defense of Biblical morality, while at the same time being persuasive to a non-Christian reader.
- Cites properly from the course texts, Scripture references, or outside sources using either MLA, APA, or Chicago Manual of Style.
- Demonstrates a polished writing style and is free from all spelling, grammar, and punctuations errors.