All I need is a paragraph about why we cant ban fossil fuels by the year of 2050. After that, I need a conclusion paragraph. It needs to be about how we like the idea about banning fossil fuels but it is not relaistic to ban them by 2050. Here are some quotes or arguments I need you to counter:
– https://www.iea.org/news/pathway-to-critical-and-formidable-goal-of-net-zero-emissions-by-2050-is-narrow-but-brings-huge-benefits
“Building on the IEA’s unrivalled energy modelling tools and expertise, the Roadmap sets out more than 400 milestones to guide the global journey to net zero by 2050. These include, from today, no investment in new fossil fuel supply projects, and no further final investment decisions for new unabated coal plants. By 2035, there are no sales of new internal combustion engine passenger cars, and by 2040, the global electricity sector has already reached net-zero emissions.�
-“Most of the global reductions in CO2 emissions between now and 2030 in the net zero pathway come from technologies readily available today. But in 2050, almost half the reductions come from technologies that are currently only at the demonstration or prototype phase.� We don’t have the technology.“Most of the global reductions in CO2 emissions between now and 2030 in the net zero pathway come from technologies readily available today. But in 2050, almost half the reductions come from technologies that are currently only at the demonstration or prototype phase.� We don’t have the technology.
-https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/electric-vehicles-total-cost-of-ownership-tool
FYI Current electricity costs where I live are 9-10 cents per kwh
This is a debate essay and my group is against the motion of “we should ban the use of fossil fuels by 2050”. All I need is a paragraph countering the quotes I sent, and the a conclusion paragraph along with it.