Corporate America has been tying more and more top executives’ compensation to some measure of firm performance to provide them with strong incentives to manage aggressively in the stockholder’s best interest. While top executives at Fortune 500 companies may have annual base salaries that can exceed 1 million dollars, it is typical that their base salary will represent only a small percentage of total compensation in normal years, with few limits placed on how high that compensation can go if the company is very successful (Jensen, 2019, para 4).
Designing an executive compensation system to achieve the desired performance is difficult. If performance is judged based on annual profits, executives might become overly focused on the short run and not position the company adequately for the long run. The same can be true if performance is evaluated based on short-term fluctuations in stock market prices. In addition, profits (and subsequently, stock prices) are the result of the efforts of thousands of workers. Perhaps even more importantly, profits are frequently the result of a strong economy or a “hot” sector and may have little to do with executive decisions. For example, the large bonuses so many executives received in 2004 followed a banner year in corporate profits.
But, if all of corporate America is doing so well, are the CEOs doing anything special to deserve such large compensation packages, especially when their workforces receive relatively little raises? Despite the annual attention in the business press and increasing opposition from shareholder groups such as significant pension funds, few companies follow one of the most basic economic principles in designing CEO compensation plans. That principle would reward based on relative company performance, but few companies tie annual bonuses to comparisons with peer group performance.
Jensen, M. (2019). CEO Incentives—It’s Not How Much You Pay, But How. [online] Hbr.org. Available at: https://hbr.org/1990/05/ceo-incentives-its-not-how-much-you-pay-but-how [Accessed 17 Oct. 2019].
- Many companies have defended large executive compensation packages that don’t appear to be justified with current company performance as rewards for past performance. Do such rewards make sense?
- Another justification often cited by companies for seemingly extravagant executive compensation packages is that competitive market pressures require them to pay well to attract and retain top managerial talent. Could paying less for less high-profile talent be a good bargain for these companies? Why or why not?
- Pay-for-performance is much easier when performance is easily measured, such as counting the number of units of specified quality a factory worker produces or the number of hits a baseball player gets. As suggested in the case, deciding how to measure performance for CEOs is more challenging. Describe what would be an appropriate set of measures for CEO performance, and briefly explain it in terms of how it would provide the proper incentives.
It is not sufficient to state your opinions; you must be able to:
- demonstrate your understanding of the case study information by accurately explaining the relevant concepts
- use the facts listed in the case study and the ideas in the textbook to draw your conclusions
- demonstrate exceptional critical thinking skills
- conduct research using the GMC Library
- apply the relevant concepts from the textbook chapters to the case study correctly
- include facts from the case study to support your position
Through writing this case study, you will demonstrate how to relate case study data/findings to international business concepts, conduct research, and cite sources using APA formatting guidelines properly. You will be responsible for using a minimum of 2 scholarly/peer-reviewed sources. Textbooks are not considered scholarly/peer-reviewed sources; however, they may still be included as supplemental references.
Your case study is to be a minimum of 3 complete pages in length. Going over the minimum page length requirement is acceptable; however, I am looking for something other than a 10+ page case study.
Be as thorough as possible when writing your case study, and remember, this is an academic assignment, so no “text-talk,” no conversational tone, and above all other things… don’t plagiarize!! Lastly, spell-check and proofread your work! Failure to follow these steps will negatively impact your grade.
For this course, you will submit the graded activity using Turnitin. An Originality Report will become available within a few minutes after your first submission. Inside the Originality Report will be a Similarity Index. The Similarity Index shows a percentage of the material in your paper that matches other sources found by Turnitin. You will be expected to have a Similarity Index of less than 15%. If your Similarity Index is greater than 15%, you will need to review your Originality Report to be sure that you have paraphrased your work appropriately and cited/referenced your sources correctly.
The Originality Report will help you to avoid plagiarism and improve the quality and content of your essay. It is strongly suggested that you keep direct quotations to a minimum and only copy and paste text with proper citations. You have until the activity due date to resubmit your work. However, there will be a 24-hour delay before the Originality Report becomes available. You are responsible for submitting your assignment on time, with a Similarity Index of less than 15%.