• Please read the following article and then critique the literature review by answering the following questions from the rubric once read the article.
• Follow the grading rubric provided below to write your critique.
Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.
Kim, Katherine K., Pamela Sankar, Machelle D. Wilson, and Sarah C. Haynes. BMC Medical Ethics 18, No. 1 (2017): 25. DOI 10.1186/s12910-017-0185-x
Grading RubricPoints
How relevant are the studies cited to the research question posed by the authors? How trustworthy do you find the sources they are citing? Defend your position with specific examples of cited sources.5 points
How appropriate/effective are their search parameters and procedures used to find literature? Do you feel confident you understand their methods and could replicate them? Why or why not?5 points
How does their review of the literature add value to the health care field? Please explain.10 points
How effectively did the authors explain how each piece of literature agreed with, disagreed with, questioned, augmented, and/or offered alternatives to their approach to the research topic and question? Justify your position with at least one example.5 points
Did they convince you they had read enough literature to address their research question and to support their argument justifying their study? What suggestions would you have to improve the literature review?10 points
Can you identify any strong bias in the studies selected in the literature review? Why or why not? Are any important studies left out?5 points
Are gaps in knowledge about the research problems identified? If so, what are they?5 points
Are important previous research studies relevant to the topic included in the literature review? 5 points
Total Points:50 points