NURS 6051 Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Information Technology – Assignment The Nurse Leader As Knowledge Worker

The Assignment:

• Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
• Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
• Include one slide that visually represents the role of a nurse leader as knowledge worker.
• Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.
• NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

  NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

  Criteria	Ratings	Pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics.	25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Ably synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker….The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Summarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. …The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair The presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed. 17 to >0 pts Poor The presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed.	25 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role.	15 to >13.0 pts Excellent The presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. 13 to >11.0 pts Good The presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. 11 to >10.0 pts Fair The presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed. 10 to >0 pts Poor The presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing.	15 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresent the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies.	35 to >31.0 pts Excellent The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback. 31 to >27.0 pts Good The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback. 27 to >24.0 pts Fair The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. 24 to >0 pts Poor The presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.	35 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. 2 to >0 pts Poor Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.	5 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources	10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Presentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources. 8 to >7.0 pts Good Presentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources. 7 to >6.0 pts Fair Presentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource. 6 to >0 pts Poor Presentation includes: 1 or no resources.	10 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.	5 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.	5 pts
  Total Points: 100

  PreviousNext