I had a bad experience with this essay as I hired someone to di it and I got a bad grade so please rewrite it according to the intructions, teachers notes, and SOURCES given. please research the other sources and fix this essay. I provided a link labeled “Moinuddin, paper 1” that has the previous paper and my teachers notes. I would advise that you look at the other sources provided and please please help me with my essay.
Here is the original assignment details:
This paper is what we call a “literature review.” The purpose of a literature review is to survey publications by academic experts to see what they have to say about a topic, compare and contrast their arguments, and make preliminary conclusions about which ones you find more convincing and worth pursuing in a more detailed case study paper (i.e. your final paper).
Additional information on literature reviews and how to write them can be found at https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/conducting_research/writing_a_literature_review.html
This paper is what we call a “literature review.” The purpose of a literature review is to survey publications by academic experts to see what they have to say about a topic, compare and contrast their arguments, and make preliminary conclusions about which ones you find more convincing and worth pursuing in a more detailed case study paper (i.e. your final paper).
Additional information on literature reviews and how to write them can be found at https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/conducting_research/writing_a_literature_review.html
Instructions:
For each the prompts you will find a citation for one scholarly source that you are required to use in your paper. You will find copies of those articles on Blackboard in the designated file for paper #1.
You must also find at least three more sources on your own (not including your textbooks). These additional sources must be scholarly, peer-reviewed publications. This is a firm requirement; so, if you are not sure how tell if a source is peer-reviewed, or have a question about a specific source, ask!
Structure and contents:
1. Provide concise summaries of what each publication contributes to answering the questions in the prompt you chose.
The most important “take-aways” from a literature review will be what the authors consider to be the best explanations for the environmental political issues they examined and why they drew their conclusions about them. Therefore, your summaries should focus on the general points the authors make about environmental governance. If the authors give a lot of attention to specific cases, bodies of data, or their research methods you may want to discuss those things briefly but is their conclusions and how they justify them that matter the most.
2. Your conclusion to this first paper should pull together the general lessons you take from the literature you have reviewed. Which of their explanations do you find most convincing and why?
The ultimate goal is to come up with a set of general principles that you can test with a detailed case study in your final paper. So, for example, if you were to choose the prompt on international environmental agreements you should conclude with what you learned from the literature about the general characteristics that contribute to their successes and/or failures. Then for your final paper you can take an in-depth look at a specific agreement, treaty, or protocol, describe and explain its successes and shortcomings, and see how well what you find supports the lessons you took from your literature review (i.e. paper #1).
Instructions:
For each the prompts you will find a citation for one scholarly source that you are required to use in your paper. You will find copies of those articles on Blackboard in the designated file for paper #1.
You must also find at least three more sources on your own (not including your textbooks). These additional sources must be scholarly, peer-reviewed publications. This is a firm requirement; so, if you are not sure how tell if a source is peer-reviewed, or have a question about a specific source, ask!
Structure and contents:
1. Provide concise summaries of what each publication contributes to answering the questions in the prompt you chose.
The most important “take-aways” from a literature review will be what the authors consider to be the best explanations for the environmental political issues they examined and why they drew their conclusions about them. Therefore, your summaries should focus on the general points the authors make about environmental governance. If the authors give a lot of attention to specific cases, bodies of data, or their research methods you may want to discuss those things briefly but is their conclusions and how they justify them that matter the most.
2. Your conclusion to this first paper should pull together the general lessons you take from the literature you have reviewed. Which of their explanations do you find most convincing and why?
The ultimate goal is to come up with a set of general principles that you can test with a detailed case study in your final paper. So, for example, if you were to choose the prompt on international environmental agreements you should conclude with what you learned from the literature about the general characteristics that contribute to their successes and/or failures. Then for your final paper you can take an in-depth look at a specific agreement, treaty, or protocol, describe and explain its successes and shortcomings, and see how well what you find supports the lessons you took from your literature review (i.e. paper #1).
I provided a link called links to other souces information. PLEASE READ OVER THEM AND FIX MY ESSAY OTHERWISE I WILL NOT PAY YOU. sorry for being strict but after my last encounter I am not taking any chances.