To prepare for the final paper, we will practice developing a STRONG THESIS in this response, backed up with specific evidence from the historical facts we studied (this is the understanding part of your writing) and one of the theoretical approaches (this is the reflection part of your writing).
- Understanding
What do you believe was Seattle CORE’S most effective grassroots strategy to combat school segregation and why? Make sure you refer to specific passages from the reading. In your thesis claim you can also take a totally different approach than presented in the book, but you still must use specific historical evidence to support your claim.
- Reflection
What was your reaction to the reading? This can be a critique of the arguments, a deconstruction of it, a new idea that you are excited about, but it must include a connection with one or more of the theoretical approaches we are discussing in class (including citations) and demonstrate you have a solid understanding of that approach in application.
Rubric
Reading Response Rubric (6)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeYour overall writing style is clear, concise and logical, and grammar is appropriate. |
2 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderstanding: You develop a strong thesis and support it with specific historical evidence from our the reading. |
2 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: You synthesize your reaction to the reading. This can be a critique of the arguments, a deconstruction of it, a new idea that you are excited about, a revelation, a connection with larger class themes or other experiences. You make a clear connection to one of our theoretical approaches. |
3 pts |
||
|
Total Points: 7 |
|||
part 1
Your reading response should be 2-3 pages long. Note that this reading has 3 parts (Intro, Chapter 1, Chapter 2). Make sure you read the intro and first chapter, chapter 2 is optional.
In your response, answer to the following prompts:
- Understanding
Select a specific passage from one of the student letters in the reading and answer this prompt: How did this student specifically advocate for their identity in this letter to their teacher? Make sure you provide evidence (direct or indirect quotations)
- Reflection
What was your personal reaction to this reading? This can be a critique of the arguments, a deconstruction of it, a new idea that you are excited about, but it must include a connection with one or more of the theoretical approaches we are discussing in class and demonstrate you have a solid understanding of that approach in application.
Explanation of terms used in the readings:
- Issei—first generation Japanese immigrant to the US
- Nisei—second generation, born in the US (US citizen of Japanese descent)
- Nikkei—broad term meaning Japanese/of Japanese descent (all encompassing)
Rubric
Some Rubric (3)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeYour overall writing style is clear, concise and logical, and grammar is appropriate. |
2 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderstanding: You demonstrate an understanding of the student letter and offer specific textual evidence how this relates to their advocacy for their identity. |
2 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis: You synthesize your reaction to the reading. This can be a critique of the arguments, a deconstruction of it, a new idea that you are excited about, or a revelation, and you make a connection with lone of our theoretical approaches. |
3 pts |
||
|
Total Points: 7 |
|||
part 2 is
To prepare for the final paper, we will practice developing a STRONG THESIS in this response, backed up with specific evidence from the historical facts we studied (this is the understanding part of your writing) and one of the theoretical approaches (this is the reflection part of your writing).
- Understanding
What do you believe was Seattle CORE’S most effective grassroots strategy to combat school segregation and why? Make sure you refer to specific passages from the reading. In your thesis claim you can also take a totally different approach than presented in the book, but you still must use specific historical evidence to support your claim.
- Reflection
What was your reaction to the reading? This can be a critique of the arguments, a deconstruction of it, a new idea that you are excited about, but it must include a connection with one or more of the theoretical approaches we are discussing in class (including citations) and demonstrate you have a solid understanding of that approach in application.
Rubric
Reading Response Rubric (6)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeYour overall writing style is clear, concise and logical, and grammar is appropriate. |
2 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderstanding: You develop a strong thesis and support it with specific historical evidence from our the reading. |
2 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: You synthesize your reaction to the reading. This can be a critique of the arguments, a deconstruction of it, a new idea that you are excited about, a revelation, a connection with larger class themes or other experiences. You make a clear connection to one of our theoretical approaches. |
3 pts |
||
|
Total Points: 7 |
|||