TLMT381 I001 Winter 2030

20 points

Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the assignment with well documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or
statements.

17 points

Establishes a good
comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements
helping to support the key focus of assignment.

15 points

Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of the assignment.

13 points

Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key
themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover
the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or
statements.

16 points

Student demonstrates
proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level
of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to
practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.

13.6 points

Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented
provide an adequate
presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.

12 points

The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental
understanding of the
course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.

10.4 points

Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents
concepts in isolation,
and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.

16 points

Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical thinking necessary for this level of work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking,
while drawing logical
conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well supported ideas and
reflection with a variety of current and/or world views
in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of
ideas throughout
assignment.

13.6 points

Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment
demonstrates the
student’s above average use of relating concepts by
using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides
adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.

12 points

Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and
connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited
perspective on key
concepts throughout
assignment. Student
appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.

10.4 points

Student demonstrates beginning understanding
of key concepts, but
overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a
problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little
semblance of critical
thinking skills.

16 points

Student thoroughly
understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented.
Overall format of
assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or
abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and
conclusion. Finished
assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. Student
uses at least of 5-7
references in assignment.

13.6 points

Student explains the
majority of points and concepts in the
assignment. Learner
demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and
organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors.
Assignment contains less than 5 resources.

12 points

Learner applies some
points and concepts
incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment
does not have a
continuous pattern of logical sequencing.
Student uses less than 3 sources or references.

10.4 points

Assignment reveals
formatting errors and a lack of organization.
Student presents an
incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key
terms. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to review and revise the assignment.

16 points

Student demonstrates an
excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style.
Presents a thorough, extensive understanding of
word usage. Student
excels in the election and
development of a well planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare a high-quality academic
assignment.

13.6 points

Student provides an
effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects
student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and present an above
average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more
than 3-5 errors. Student provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal requirements.

12 points

Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than 5 errors. Key
terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained by student. Student uses a basic vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is average,
but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter.

10.4 points

Topics, concepts, and
ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student needs to review and revise assignment.

16 points

Student provides a high caliber, formatted assignment. Learner
exhibits excellent use of computer technology in the
development of
assignment. Quality and appropriateness of stated references demonstrate the
student’s ability to use technology to conduct applicable research. Given assignment includes
appropriate word
processing, spreadsheet and/or other computer applications as part of the final product.

13.6 points

Assignment presents an above-average use of formatting skills, with less than 3 errors. Students has a good command of computer applications to
format information and/or figures in an appropriate format. Student uses at least two types of computer applications to produce a quality assignment.

12 points

Student demonstrates a basic knowledge of computer applications. Appearance of final
assignment demonstrates
the student’s limited ability to format and present data. Resources used in
assignment are limited. Student may need to obtain further help in the use of computer
applications and Internet research.

10.4 points

Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The student may need to take additional training or obtain help while preparing an assignment. Research and resources presented
in the assignment are limited. Student needs to expand research scope. The number of formatting errors is not acceptable.