To what extent does the implementation of performance evaluations on healthcare workers impact affective commitment and retention in healthcare employees?
Part B of every paper is usually where the authors report their findings and analysis of the findings. This is often done with the help of statistics, facts, graphs, tables, etc. (however, it doesn’t have to be). Since your paper is more of a review paper than discovery-based research, you WILL NOT present original findings but discuss existing research.
The findings part is the more descriptive part – where you will report what the literature says about your topic. You can organize this section by themes, industries, or any other organizational structure that serves your argument.
You can think of your critical evaluation part in the following manner. This is where you tell the reader what the above findings mean (or how we should think about these findings). Would these practices work for all organizations? What might be the unintended consequences (risks, threats)? What are the potential benefits of adopting these practices (strengths, opportunities)?
Most reports will end with a recommendation part that is tailored to the specific client and their needs. You are NOT asked to provide any specific recommendations because you do not have a specific client. However, you can incorporate some ideas into your critical evaluation part.