Take careful notes while walking through. How has the curator organized the space for your gaze and movement? Is there information about the concept of the show or the individual works? Too much information or too little? Note where the curator seems to have put works in conversation with each other. What works stand out or play supporting roles? Consider the lighting, the color of the walls or other staging elements, and the physical relationship you have with the works of art, which has been carefully created for you to experience.
Draft an exhibition review that has the following elements:
A title that engages the reader
An opening paragraph that informs the reader on the premise of the show
A thesis that consists of your argument about the value of the exhibition as a whole (not whether it was good or bad)
Body paragraphs explaining the significance of what is on display (what stands out and why? are the objects telling a story? are they rarely seen? etc); description of the installation, the setting; high points in the exhibition and weaker choices (if there are any);
A conclusion that summarizes your evaluation
Submit your exhibition review with your selfie image embedded in the last page or attached in the “comments” (don’t worry about this step)
Make sure it is at least 600 words (2 pages)
Revise and proofread
https://www.nortonsimon.org/exhibitions/virtual-exhibitions/representing-women/