In this essay, you will analyze how well Barszcz argues his point about the effectiveness of distance-learning. You will not be arguing about whether or not, you agree with him or whether or not, you were create a distance learning. You’ll give your opinion about how well Barszcz appeals to his readers, through ethos, pathos and logos, to prove his point.
In the introduction, you will state the tittle and authors name and give a one sentence summary of the essay. You wouldn’t go onto summarize the essay more detail in lead into your thesis statement of whether or not you feel that Barszcz does a good job of arguing his point.
Body paragraph one ethos in this paragraph you explain why Barszcz is or is not qualified to write. This essay is the credible source what makes him a credible or not credible.
In body paragraph Two logos, should focus on the logic of the SH word fact, statistics and other logical statements does to make his point
In body paragraph three pethos should focus on the way that Barscz appeals to his audience emotions through the word to use is the way he construction sentences in the way he lets his read it to the main argument
Conclusion, this paragraph should wrap up what you said in the essay and bring the Raiders ascent of closure. You should have at least two quotes in one paraphrase in each body paragraph.