You must have read at least up to Supplementary Record 1 in The Trial of Tempel Anneke (including the introduction).

Purpose

Historians often have little to work with when attempting to analyze history.  We cannot interview the players involved, and instead must make do with the evidence that chance has preserved.  In order to get at the information they want, the historian therefore often finds it necessary to ‘read between the lines’, all while armed with the knowledge of historical context to guide them through.

These short assignments are designed to help guide you through the documents collected in The Trial of Tempel Anneke and prepare you for writing the final paper for this course.

 

Instructions

You must have read at least up to Supplementary Record 1 in The Trial of Tempel Anneke (including the introduction).

Answer the following questions:

  • Being a folk healer could raise suspicion, but statistics show that the majority of convicted witches during the European witch-hunt were not folk healers.  Tempel Anneke was one herself.  Discuss the ways in which her practice of being a healer impacted her case and treatment by the court authorities.
  • How did the use of torture change Tempel Anneke’s trial?  How did her answers change?  Did the focus of the court’s questions change?  How did torture impact the court’s belief in her guilt?  Discuss any other changes that you might see.
  • How does the court view torture and the evidence extracted from it?  Do you think there were any doubts about it’s effectiveness and the truthfulness of the answers?  Are there any rules regulating its use that you see evidence of?

Your responses must be at least 750 words long, double-spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, 1″ margins.

This is not a formal essay.  You do not need an introduction or a conclusion paragraph.  You do need full sentences and a paragraph format.  Simply answer the question in a logical, coherent, and thorough way.  Provide evidence from the text to back up your statements.

All evidence you use from the text must be cited.  For short assignments such as these, you may simply give the page number using in-text citations.  Example:

    • Tempel Anneke said that the boy Curdt sprained his leg while jumping across the water (58).

If your copy of the book does not have page numbers, use the folio number for your citation.

Short Assignment Rubric- corrected (1) (3)
Short Assignment Rubric- corrected (1) (3)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Accuracy

30 pts

Exemplary
All terms and concepts are used accurately. Arguments are supported by evidence.

15 pts

Competent
One or two terms and concepts are used inaccurately or are not supported by evidence.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Three or more terms and concepts are used incorrectly, and arguments are not supported by evidence.
30 pts
Clarity

20 pts

Exemplary
All points are stated clearly and are well explained.

10 pts

Competent
One or two points are hard to understand.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Language is consistently vague, and ideas are poorly explained.
20 pts
Completeness

20 pts

Exemplary
All required topics were addressed.

10 pts

Competent
One required topic was not addressed.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Two or more required topics were not addressed.
20 pts
Length

20 pts

Exemplary
Assignment was at least 750 words.

10 pts

Competent
Assignment was from 480- 750 words long.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Assignment was less than 480 words long.
20 pts
Language Mechanics

10 pts

Exemplary
Assignment contains 0-1 errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling.

5 pts

Competent
Assignment contains 2-3 grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Assignment contains 4 or more grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext

Are you struggling with your paper? Let us handle it - WE ARE EXPERTS!

Whatever paper you need - we will help you write it

Get started

Starts at $9 /page

How our paper writing service works

It's very simple!

  • Fill out the order form

    Complete the order form by providing as much information as possible, and then click the submit button.

  • Choose writer

    Select your preferred writer for the project, or let us assign the best writer for you.

  • Add funds

    Allocate funds to your wallet. You can release these funds to the writer incrementally, after each section is completed and meets your expected quality.

  • Ready

    Download the finished work. Review the paper and request free edits if needed. Optionally, rate the writer and leave a review.